Illinois Assessment of Readiness English Language Arts Reading Grade 7
Eighteen passages, with six questions on each, on theme, argument, word meaning, and how a text is built.
These questions are original. This is not an official Illinois Assessment of Readiness test, and FreeExam is not affiliated with the Illinois State Board of Education.
What the Overlook Needed
For the overlook project at a fictional Illinois park, the student design team was given a map, a budget, and two photographs taken from a wheelchair. The existing trail reached a low stone wall. Standing visitors could see the river beyond it, but the photographs showed mostly stone. The assignment asked the team to improve access to the view while preserving the wall.
Dara began with a platform. She drew a graceful curve above the wall and added a ramp from the trail. On the map, it occupied only a small corner. She had filled nearly a page with the shape before Luis asked how high it would stand. “High enough to see,” she said. Luis placed one of the photographs beside her drawing and asked her to mark an eye level.
Their teacher supplied measurements and explained that this was a classroom design study, not a plan approved for construction. When the students drew the proposed height at the map’s scale, the ramp required much more space than Dara had shown. It would reach across a drainage channel and into a section of protected plants. She shortened the ramp on paper. The teacher asked which measurement she had changed to justify the shorter line. Dara could not name one.
Luis proposed a different location: a bend where the ground was already higher. The wall there had a gap used by maintenance staff. A viewing space beside the gap might require less new construction. Dara objected that visitors would have to continue farther along the trail. The team traced both routes, noting distance, slope, surface, and the view from a seated position. The second site was farther away, but its approach had fewer steep sections.
They made models at the same scale. Dara placed a tiny seated figure at each viewing point and photographed what its eyes would face. The first model’s view was excellent, but its approach still crossed the drainage channel. The second offered a narrower river view without crossing the channel. Neither model resolved the condition of the trail surface after rain; the team marked that as a question for a future site visit.
At the presentation, Dara put her curved platform drawing on the first slide. The next slide showed its footprint at scale. She recommended that the park investigate the second site before selecting a design. A visitor asked why she had included a rejected idea. Dara turned back to the first photograph of the wall. “It’s easy to make a place look open from above,” she said. She held the seated figure beside the map so its head barely rose above her thumb.
1.What does the opening assignment require the team to balance?
2.Why does Luis ask Dara to mark an eye level?
3.What is wrong with Dara’s attempt to shorten the ramp on paper?
4.Which comparison most strongly supports investigating the second site?
5.Why does the team leave a question about rain in its presentation?
6.How does Dara’s final remark develop the central idea?
A Line Above the Water
When my father taught me to mend a fishing net, he said a good knot should not announce itself. I remembered that as I fastened photographs to the harbor exhibit in our Chicago school. My assigned section was a sequence of four pictures taken from the same railing over many years. I wanted the mounting line to vanish behind them.
In the oldest picture, the water reached nearly to the bottom of the frame. A second showed stones beneath the railing. The third had a boat tied where the stones had been, and the fourth showed a new barrier. I arranged them from oldest to newest. Beneath the line I wrote, “The shore slowly disappears.” It sounded like the beginning of a serious report.
My partner Leena read the captions on the photographs’ backs. The oldest had been taken during a storm. The second was dated late summer. The third had no month, and the fourth had been taken after work on the walkway. “Are these showing one change?” she asked. I tightened the line until the last picture tilted.
I told her the dates proved the sequence. She brought a fifth photograph from the archive box. It belonged between the first two by year, but showed even more exposed stone than the second. I could have left it out. We had space for only four pictures, and nobody had asked us to explain the contents of the whole box.
At home, I showed my father the photographs on my phone. He enlarged the storm picture, then the one with the barrier. He did not explain the water levels. He asked what my sentence could promise. I said nothing for a while, annoyed that he had found Leena’s question without hearing it.
The next day, we lowered the line and spread all five pictures on a table. We wrote down the available dates, weather notes, and changes to the walkway. Some spaces stayed blank. Our new label invited viewers to compare what the pictures showed and what the captions left unknown. We chose four photographs, including the one I had wanted to omit, and kept a small reference card listing the fifth.
The exhibit did not tell a smooth story anymore. It had a storm, a dry-looking edge, a boat, a barrier, and questions in between. When the line disappeared behind the photographs, I could still feel where I had tightened it too far.
7.Why is the narrator attracted to the first label?
8.How does Leena challenge the label?
9.What does the narrator’s thought about omitting the fifth picture reveal?
10.What is the effect of the father’s question about a promise?
11.Why is the final exhibit less smooth than the original?
12.How does the image of the tightened line work at the end?
Already on the Bark
The science club at a Joliet middle school built a hallway display about moth color. In the population, some moths were already darker than others. That difference was present before soot darkened the tree bark. When the bark turned dark, birds found the lighter moths more easily. Darker moths survived more often and left more offspring. The display calls this natural selection acting on variation already present.
The display rejects two other stories. In the first, the moths tried to change color so they would match the bark, and the attempt was inherited by the next generation. The club writes that trying is not how the color shifted. Moths did not choose a new shade. In the second story, use-and-disuse is inherited: needing a trait, or using it, changes what offspring receive. The display says that account does not fit. Nothing a moth did with its wings during its life was passed on as a new color. The darker wings were already being born in the population.
A later panel says the advantage can move. When the air grew cleaner and the bark lightened, lighter moths were harder for birds to see, and they became common again. The panel uses that return to make the same point. Selection did not paint a color onto the moths. It changed which of the colors already present were more likely to survive. Soot on an adult's wings was not a stain copied by its offspring.
13.According to the display, how did darker moths become more common when the bark turned dark?
14.How does the display answer the story that the moths tried to change color?
15.What does the display say about the claim that use-and-disuse is inherited?
16.What role do birds play in the display's account of the dark bark?
17.Why does the later panel describe cleaner air and lighter bark?
18.What does the panel mean by saying selection did not paint a color onto the moths?
Level Water at Lockport
On the Illinois and Michigan Canal trail in Lockport, a wayside sign explains the old canal. It was built so boats could travel between the Chicago area on Lake Michigan and the Illinois River, and from the Illinois River toward the Mississippi. The land between those waters is not flat. A lock raises or lowers a boat from one water level to the next. The sign calls a lock a water elevator for boats, not a decoration on the bank.
The student's uncle says the canal was a race for the fastest current, and that boats moved because the whole canal tilted like a slide from the lake down to the river. The sign disagrees. Between locks the water was kept as level and as quiet as the builders could manage, so a boat could be towed without fighting a steep stream. The drop in the land is handled inside the locks, one chamber at a time, not as one long chute.
The student keeps two ideas apart. The reason for the canal was a navigable connection, a way for boats to pass. The tool that made the connection possible on uneven ground was the lock. Mixing them into a single downhill rush loses both ideas. A connection can be slow. The sign's point is that the boats could pass, not that they won a sprint.
19.According to the sign, why was the Illinois and Michigan Canal built?
20.What does a lock do in the sign's account?
21.What mistake does the uncle make about the canal?
22.Why did the builders want the water between locks to stay level and quiet?
23.Which two ideas does the student keep separate?
24.What does the phrase "water elevator" mean on the sign?
The Last Bus Downtown
A student editorial asks the Rockford library board to open the west-side branch on Sunday from 12:00 to 4:00. The downtown library is already open on Sunday. A board member says Sunday hours at the branch would only copy downtown. The writer answers with the bus. The ride from the school neighborhood to downtown takes 40 minutes, and the last Sunday bus back leaves downtown at 3:00. A student who arrived downtown at 2:00 would have one hour before that bus leaves. That is not a useful study afternoon.
The branch is a 10-minute walk from the school. Sunday hours there would be time students can actually use. Sixty-four students signed a petition asking for those hours. The writer calls the petition a list of people who would come, not a count of every student in Rockford. A list of 64 cannot be stretched into a claim about the whole city.
The writer also names the cost. A Sunday opening needs two extra staff members, and that pay is real. She does not ask the board to pretend the cost is zero. She asks for a three-month trial so the board can see whether the rooms are used before it makes the hours permanent. The trial is the request. A promise that every chair will stay full is not.
25.How does the writer use the Sunday bus schedule to answer the board member?
26.Why does the writer mention that the branch is a 10-minute walk?
27.How should a reader take the petition of 64 students?
28.What does the writer concede about a Sunday opening?
29.Why does the writer ask for a three-month trial?
30.What is the editorial's request?
The Piece of the Walk
Line 1: The lake has pulled its color back and left a tin sheet against the step. Line 2: My dog tries the boards with one paw and then declines the lesson. Line 3: Behind us the drive keeps its cars, a low fact that will not freeze. Line 4: I came out for a long walk and bargained myself down to this square of path.
Line 5: Wind finds the gap above my collar and files its complaint there. Line 6: The benches wear white caps they never bought. Line 7: A runner passes, counts us as part of the scenery, and is gone past the curve. Line 8: I wish the runner well and do not follow.
Line 9: The dog sits, which is her whole speech. Line 10: I sit on the least icy board, with the city loud at my shoulder. Line 11: Staying is not the same thing as liking the wind. Line 12: It is the piece of the walk I can still keep.
The Key in Chapter Three
EXCERPT FROM THE FICTIONAL NOVEL LAMPS ON THE LANDING Mara found the spare key behind the green shutter, exactly where her brother had said it would be. It was tied to a nail with a strip of cloth. Below the window, the hardware shop was dark. Her uncle had taken the main keys to the station, and the rain had followed him down the hill.
She untied the cloth and held the key toward the door. Then she saw the note wedged under the shutter: “Wait for me. The back shelf is loose.” The writing was her brother’s. Through the glass she could see the lamp he had repaired that morning, bright even without a flame. A minute earlier she had wanted to be the person who opened the shop. Now she sat on the dry strip beneath the window, with the key in her palm.
REVIEW BY A STUDENT IN GALENA The final chapter of Lamps on the Landing has an ending worth waiting for. I will not describe it, but the book’s early habit of making readers wait begins here. Mara has a key, a task, and a reason to hurry. The author stops her at the threshold. We are left outside with her, seeing just enough through the shop glass to want the door open.
For me, the middle chapters repeat that pause too often. Chapters 5 through 8 return to the same aisles and several similar conversations. Another reader might enjoy the familiar shop. I wanted the plot to move beyond it sooner. The best repeated object is the repaired lamp: the first time it appears, Mara sees something her brother has made ready; later, the lamp becomes a reason for both characters to return.
Some students say the town must be Galena because its street climbs steeply from a river. The novel never supplies the town’s name. I read the setting as a fictional place that can borrow familiar shapes without reproducing a street map. Readers who know river towns may recognize a feeling of the hill, but recognition is not an address.
READER COMMENT The reviewer calls the middle too slow, but those repeated visits let me notice changes in who speaks and who listens. In chapter 6, Mara begins a conversation she avoided in chapter 3. I agree that the lamp matters, but I think the aisles matter too. Returning to the same place can make a small change visible.
37.What causes Mara to delay opening the shop in the excerpt?
38.Which evidence from the excerpt supports the reviewer’s description of readers being left at a threshold?
39.How do the review and the reader comment differ about repeated settings?
40.Which claim could be checked most directly against the excerpt itself?
41.Why does the reviewer distinguish a familiar feeling from an address?
42.What is a useful effect of placing the reader comment after the review?
Away from the Intake
A class reading describes the Chicago River and the city's drinking water. Chicago took that water from Lake Michigan. In the nineteenth century the river flowed into the lake, and waste in the river could move toward the intakes. The city's answer was the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, opened in 1900. The canal joined the river to the Des Plaines River. Water was sent away from the lake, toward the Des Plaines, then the Illinois River, and eventually the Mississippi.
A sentence on a student poster says the river was reversed so boats would have a shorter trip to the lake. The reading says that poster mixes up the purpose. Boats did use the canal, and the word Ship is in the name, but the reason for sending the water away from the lake was to protect the drinking water. The old current carried water toward the lake; the new current carries water away. Neither direction by itself tells how long a boat route is. The new direction carries water inland.
The reading keeps two results apart. One result was navigation: goods could move between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi system. The other result was sanitary: the city's waste did not drain into the same lake that supplied its water. The poster keeps only a travel story and points that story the wrong way. The reading says the sanitary result explains the direction of the flow. The word Ship, by itself, does not prove the poster right.
43.According to the class reading, why was the Chicago River made to flow away from Lake Michigan?
44.What does the student poster get wrong?
45.Which two results does the reading keep apart?
46.What does the reading say the word Ship, by itself, does not prove?
47.After the water leaves the canal, which way does the reading say it goes?
48.What does the old direction of the river establish in the passage?
What the Barrels Could Tell
REPORT TO THE CARBONDALE SCHOOL GARDEN COMMITTEE Two raised beds, Red and Blue, were built with the same inside dimensions and placed side by side. Red contained sandy soil. Blue contained a soil-and-compost mixture. Each had an outlet connected to a collection barrel. The class wanted to compare drainage after one heavy rain.
At the same time that afternoon, students measured 9 liters in Red’s barrel and 3 liters in Blue’s. Both barrels had been empty before the rain, and neither overflowed. The next-morning observation for Red read, “Surface dry; soil beneath the surface slightly damp.” For Blue, the note read, “Surface damp; soil wet to the first knuckle.” These were descriptions, not measurements of the total water stored inside either bed.
A poster made before the committee meeting stated, “Blue is better in every way because it keeps more water.” Its illustration showed taller seedlings, although the class had not recorded growth measurements during this comparison. A student asked to remove the sandy bed before the next planting.
Garden volunteer Ms. Osei brought a separate record from the previous spring. During a cool, rainy week, several bean seeds in a compost-rich bed had rotted before sprouting. The record did not concern Red or Blue, which were new. She said the earlier experience was a reason to consider conditions and plant needs before declaring one mixture best for every use. It did not show that this year’s Blue bed would necessarily lose seeds.
The class proposed a second comparison over several weeks. They would record rainfall, barrel volumes, soil observations at a set depth, and seedling growth. For a test of the mixtures, they would use equal numbers of the same kind of seed, planted on the same date. The report also noted that side-by-side beds could still receive slightly different sunlight at some times of day; the students planned to record that difference rather than assume it away.
At the meeting, the class replaced the poster’s title with “One Rain, Two Drainage Results.” It retained the two barrel numbers and added the next-morning observations in a separate column. Ms. Osei’s earlier record appeared in a box labeled “A reason for further testing.” The committee kept both beds for the new comparison.
49.What do the 9-liter and 3-liter measurements directly establish?
50.Which omitted information most directly challenges the poster’s phrase “better in every way”?
51.How should Ms. Osei’s earlier record be used?
52.What is the difference between the barrel column and the next-morning column?
53.Why does the second comparison use equal numbers of the same kind of seed planted together?
54.How does the revised title improve the report?
Draft in the Corner
The community theater in Oak Park is staging a play about a family hardware store. The March rehearsal program places the intermission after scene 4. The word DRAFT is printed in the corner of that copy. The opening-night program, printed on Friday, places the intermission after scene 5. The Friday program has no draft mark.
At the dress rehearsal the actor finished scene 4, left the stage, and waited for the house lights. Scene 5 never started, because he was already off. He had used the March copy. That copy matched the way rehearsals had been divided in the spring. It did not match the program the audience would hold on opening night.
The stage manager taps the Friday page and says that print is the order for the performance. When the two programs conflict, the Friday program is the one the audience will follow. People in the seats will not stand up after scene 4. The March program can still show how the cast rehearsed. It cannot tell the actor when the house is supposed to stretch.
55.When does the opening-night program place the intermission?
56.Why did the actor leave the stage before scene 5?
57.What does the word DRAFT in the corner of the March program tell a reader?
58.When the two programs conflict, which one gives the order for opening night?
59.What is the March program still useful for?
60.Why does it matter that the audience has the Friday program?
Eleven Cars of Thirty
Priya's letter to the Champaign city council asks for a stop-for-pedestrians sign at the painted crosswalk between her middle school and the park. The crosswalk already has paint. It does not have a sign. In one week she counted 30 cars that passed while students were in the crosswalk. Eleven of those cars did not slow. She writes that 11 of 30 is not every driver, and it is not most drivers. The count supports a narrower claim: some drivers did not slow for students who were already in the paint.
A council member says students should walk two blocks to the signal at the corner. Priya answers that the corner route crosses a bus driveway, where buses pull in and out at dismissal. The park gate lines up with the painted crosswalk, so the painted one is the path students already use. Sending them to the signal would trade the unsigned paint for a driveway.
Priya does not claim a sign will stop every car. She asks the city to put up the sign and then repeat the count for one week. The second count would show whether more drivers slow. It would not prove the street perfectly safe. She wants the sign, the follow-up count, and no promise the paint cannot keep.
61.What is Priya asking the city to add at the crosswalk?
62.What does the count of 11 cars out of 30 support?
63.How does Priya answer the council member who wants students to use the corner signal?
64.What trade does Priya say the corner route would make?
65.What limitation does Priya admit a sign would still have?
66.What does Priya want the week after the sign goes up to show?
The Flag at the Fork
Marisol and her older brother Ben hike at Garden of the Gods, in the Shawnee National Forest in southern Illinois. Fog sits in the trees. Marisol says the fog must have closed the trail, because she cannot see the next marker. Ben stops at a stake and reads the note wired to it: the flagged loop is open, there is loose stone on the east stairs, and hikers should use the handrail.
A red ribbon blocks a different path, back at the fork they have already passed. That path is closed because a washout took out a step, not because of the fog. The note never mentions weather. Ben takes the flagged loop, keeps a hand on the rail, and does not tease Marisol for wanting to turn around. She follows, still watching the fog.
At the overlook the fog lifts enough to show one sandstone wall and hides the next. Marisol says the view is ruined. Ben says a part of a wall is what this weather is willing to show, and they came to see the place on this day, not in a picture of a different day. He stays at the rail until she has looked as long as she wants.
67.Why does Marisol think the trail is closed?
68.What does the stake note tell the hikers?
69.What does the red ribbon mark, and why is that path closed?
70.How does Ben respond when Marisol wants to turn around?
71.What does Marisol miss by calling the view ruined?
72.What reason does Ben give for accepting the partial view?
Who Owned the Brick
In a history report, a student describes a walk through Chicago's Pullman neighborhood. In the 1880s George Pullman built a planned town for workers who made railroad sleeping cars. The houses were brick, the streets were ordered, and the company owned the homes the workers rented. The report says a tidy street is not the same fact as a fair rent. Design can be seen from the sidewalk. The rent bill cannot.
In 1894 the company cut wages. Rents did not fall with the wages. Workers lived where the employer was also the landlord, so a pay cut and a rent bill arrived from the same direction. The report calls that bind the reason for the strike that followed. The strike, in this account, was not about a dislike of brick houses. People can object to a wage and a rent at the same time they walk on an even street.
A class handout praises the lawns and calls the planned town a gift of order. The report quotes that phrase and answers it. Order of the streets can be real. Calling the town a gift skips the rent and the wage cut. A gift is not a bill. The last paragraph tells a visitor to look twice: first at the brick, which is design, and then at who owned the brick, which is power. The handout does only the first look.
73.What does the report say George Pullman built in the 1880s?
74.Why does the report say a tidy street is not the same fact as a fair rent?
75.What bind does the report describe in 1894?
76.According to the report, what was the strike about?
77.How does the report answer the handout's phrase "a gift of order"?
78.What two looks does the last paragraph tell a visitor to take?
How the Rain Leaves
A park committee in Aurora is choosing a shelter for a path along the Fox River. The path to the playground already floods in a hard rain. Design Elm costs less. It has a solid roof, and a gutter empties at one corner onto that path. In a hard rain the corner floods the walk. Design Ash costs more. Its roof holds a thin layer of plants, rain leaves more slowly, and the walk stayed passable in the storm the committee watched.
The committee selects Ash. Elm's lower price stays in the first column of the sheet so nobody can say the price was hidden. Cost is a fact the committee is willing to show. It is not the fact that decides, because this shelter is for a path that already floods. The note says the vote is for this path and not a rule that every park in Aurora must buy a plant roof.
One member says the plant roof never needs care. The committee's note rejects that claim. The plants need watering in a dry August and weeding twice a summer. The note names that work before the vote, so Ash will not be described as a roof that cares for itself. The committee still chooses Ash because of how the rain leaves the roof.
79.Which design does the committee select, and why?
80.What problem does Design Elm cause in a hard rain?
81.Why does Elm's lower price stay in the first column?
82.What care does the note say the plant roof still needs?
83.Which claim by a committee member does the note reject?
84.What limit does the note put on the vote for Ash?
Forty Was the Lower Path
Tuesday's brief in an Alton school paper, written after a cleanup above the Mississippi, said the grade 7 crew collected 40 bags of trash on the lower path. It named the crew and the path and stopped there. A reader who saw only Tuesday left with that crew, that path, and 40 bags as the whole cleanup.
Thursday's paper printed a correction under a heading that pointed back at the Tuesday sentence. The crew did not change. The lower path did not change. The Tuesday count had omitted the stairs. The stairs added 15 bags. Forty plus 15 is 55, and 55 is the corrected total for the cleanup.
Forty remains true for the lower path alone. It is not the total once the stairs are included. The correction adds the stairs and replaces the total. It does not invent a new crew or a new path. Quoting 40 as the whole cleanup after Thursday means quoting a figure the paper has narrowed. The Thursday line is the line that stands for the full count.
85.What did Tuesday's brief report about the cleanup?
86.What does Thursday's correction change, and what does it leave the same?
87.After Thursday, what is still true about the number 40?
88.How does the passage get the corrected total of 55?
89.What had Tuesday omitted?
90.Why is it a mistake, after Thursday, to quote 40 as the whole cleanup?
The Floor That Holds Water
A ranger talks to visitors at the Cache River wetlands in southern Illinois, near the cypress woods by Belknap. She says the floodplain spreads high water across a wide, flat floor instead of sending it all downstream in one pulse. Cypress and tupelo stand in water that would kill a tree whose roots need dry ground. Those trees can live with flooded roots. A crop that needs dry feet cannot.
A visitor says the swamp is wasted land because crops will not grow there. The ranger answers that the wetland is doing a job a field of crops cannot do: holding floodwater and giving it time to sink and to slow. The word wasted, she says, assumes the only use of land is a harvest. The passage of water is a use, even when nothing is cut and sold.
She offers one figure and limits it. During one spring rise, by her estimate, the wetland stored water that would have added about half a meter to a narrow ditch downstream if the floodplain had been walled off. The word about marks an estimate from that one rise, not a promise for every flood. A wall along the ditch would speed the water downstream and push the problem onto the next town. Leaving the floor open trades a dry field for a slower river. She says that trade is the point.
91.What does the ranger say the floodplain does with high water?
92.How does the ranger answer the visitor who calls the swamp wasted land?
93.Why can cypress and tupelo stand in the wetland, according to the ranger?
94.How should a reader take the ranger's figure of about half a meter?
95.What would a wall along the ditch do, according to the ranger?
96.What trade does the ranger say is the point of leaving the floodplain open?
A Meter of Mowed Edge
Elena speaks to the Bloomington park board about a strip of milkweed along Constitution Trail. Neighbors call the strip messy and want mowed grass. She says monarch caterpillars eat milkweed, and mowing in June cuts the plants those caterpillars are on. She is asking the board to leave the milkweed through the summer and to mow a border a meter wide along the trail edge.
She holds up a count from one Tuesday morning: 14 caterpillars on the strip, and zero on the mowed lawn across the path. She tells the board the count is one morning, not a full summer. It supports a difference between the strip and the lawn on that day. It does not prove what every week of the year would show.
Elena says she is not asking the board to love the look of the strip. The look and the habitat are two different votes. She wants the habitat vote to pass, and she wants the edge trimmed so the trail looks kept. The meter of mowed grass is the part of the neighbors' request she can meet without cutting the plants the caterpillars are using.
97.What is Elena asking the board to do?
98.Why does Elena oppose mowing the strip in June?
99.What does Elena say the Tuesday count can and cannot support?
100.What compromise does Elena offer the neighbors who want the trail to look kept?
101.What does Elena say she is not asking the board to feel?
102.What does Elena mean by saying the look and the habitat are two different votes?
The Loop the Rope Shut
At Mississippi Palisades State Park near Savanna, a class compares two pages about the overlook walk. A printed trail card from last year says the walk is 2 miles. The ranger's log, which the teacher reads from a May update, says the walk is 1.2 miles. The extra 0.8 mile on the old card was a side loop. That loop washed out in April and is closed with a rope. The card has not been reprinted.
The log says the 1.2 miles goes to the overlook and returns by the same stairs. It is not a loop. The stairs are already included in that out-and-back distance. A hiker who adds extra distance to turn the walk into a circuit is adding trail the log does not describe. Treating the closed loop as if it were still open would send people toward the rope.
A hiker who trusts the old card will plan for a longer walk and may go looking for a loop that is shut. The log matches the trail as it is this season. The card matches the trail as it was before April. A family that splits up, one following 2 miles and one following 1.2 miles, is not walking two versions of an open trail. One of them is following a distance that includes a path the rope has closed.
103.What distances do the old trail card and the ranger's log give for the overlook walk?
104.Why do the two distances differ?
105.What mistake might a hiker make by trusting the old card?
106.Which page matches the trail as it is this season?
107.Why does the log say the 1.2-mile walk is not a loop?
108.Why are the two family members not walking two versions of an open trail?